Let's exercise our cerebral selves shall we? Hopefully, by the image above you'll know what this post is about.
So now, let's digress.
In your best imitation of a overtly political, liberal extremist: what would you do when faced with a law that is clearly unjust, and unsuccessful in creating anything positive for humanity?
Take for example, the racial segregation laws in the good ol' U-S of A in the 1960s. Who is old enough to remember "separate, but equal"? I'm sure not. (Ladies, that's a hint.)
Well, for those who have forgotten, the notion of creating something separate, but equal developed a sort of inherent contradiction. We silly Americans would come to realize that separate, almost meant not-equal by default. What was separate would come under the forces of separate and disparate environmental factors, and therefore would become not-equal in a mere nano-second.
Are identical twins, truly identical? Genetically they are. But in development they experience different phenomena that cause them to diverge from one another.
But where would we be as a nation and world society if those little black school children in Arkansas didn't try to attend an all-white elementary school? The very fabric through which free-society and democracy is weaved is based upon the notion that we should "question the convention" and dispute that which is believed to be unjust.
Now let's jump out of political-science class and back into our manly sports world. What is the Olympic rule that China is almost surely breaking?
- A gymnast must be at least 16 years of age, or turning 16 within the calendar year to compete in the Olympics
Why is this so? Why is it that the only sports in the entire Olympics to have any sort of age restriction is gymnastics and men's soccer (an equally idiotic restriction)? What sort of purpose does this serve?
Proponents of the age restriction claim that it is necessary to protect young girls' bodies from the extremes associated with gymnastics training. This claim is absolute rubbish. Girls don't wait 2 extra years to begin training just because they can't officially compete until 16. Training still starts as young as ever, they just wait for a chance to compete on the big stage.
For example, Nastia Liukin has been a world class gymnast since the age of 15. It was said that if she were eligible, she would have definitely made the US Olympic squad. But she wasn't. So instead she trained as hard as ever and competed in junior tournaments in the mean time.
It is said that younger girls, with less developed hips have a slight advantage in gymnastics. They are more able to do twists and flips as a result of their slimmer bodies. But then again, there is always an advantage associated with maturity and experience. With more practice, gymnasts are better able to control those twists and flips into clean fluid performances which would garner the highest scores.
If a younger gymnast mixes her agility with breathtakingly exquisite body control, and defines herself as the best gymnast in the world, shouldn't she be at least allowed the chance to compete for gold?
Here's a quote from swimming legend Gary Hall Jr. via the LA Times:
I don’t understand why a 14-year-old can’t compete in the Olympics. It’s supposed to be the best in sport and He won. Who cares if she’s 14?
I remember being 14. There is no advantage in the world to being 14, unless you are competing in a pimple contest. When I think of being 14, I think weak and awkward, not Olympic gold medalist in gymnastics. I would imagine that being 14 would be a terrible disadvantage.
I guess I don’t know very much about gymnastics.
Wouldn’t it be embarrassing if a 14-year-old beat you at the Olympics though, just a little?
The world we experience is all about how we perceive what we sense. So what if instead of a communist country rife with censorship and human rights issues trying to cheat the system, we see these events as a nation so enamored with the beauty of its "underage" gymnasts that it sees injustice in their ineligibility to compete. And against this injustice, it must protest.
Sadly, that scenario only works if those being wronged are righteous in their actions. China, if you
are lying about their ages, admit falsification as soon as possible. Only then can we get behind you, in protesting this blatantly useless age restriction.
Read/Discuss >>